Talk:Solar eclipse of May 1, 1185

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Eclipses task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Europe Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Solar eclipse of May 1, 1185 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the solar eclipse of 1 May 1185 gave rise to the first known description of flame-like tongues of live embers?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/April.

Wikipedia

Gregorian/Julian Dating?

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Laurentinian codex is quoted by "On the first day of the month of May, on the day of the Saint Prophet Jeremiah, on Wednesday[...]" which would perfectly fit the eclipse in Gregorian time. In Julian calendar (which I think was in place in the 1185 Rus), it should have been April 24th. Can anyone clarify on that? Is the codex quoted in a translated and date-transduced edition? --178.12.116.78 (talk) 20:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic