Talk:Sinsen station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   • References The links to Ref numbers 2 and 10 are broken.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Article on hold until issues can be addressed. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

   Dead links are now fixed. Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:52, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Article passed. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 14:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC)