File:Shivrajkumar.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Shivrajkumar.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shiva Rajkumar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Names of notable family members in 'see also' section

edit

Why has it been reverted? Kpddg (talk) 11:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

No space in name applicability of "Indian name" template

edit

"In this Indian name, the name Rajkumar is a patronymic" etc is nonsense. It's his stage name, as the article itself says and "Indian name" template doesn't apply at all. Plus as kn-wiki and countless sources (g-news for eg) attest, there is no space in that stage name. This edit did it; with no discussion, no refs and as a minor edit! I'd move it myself, but not yet bold enough to touch a top viewed page. Hemanthah (talk) 11:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

There is space! Here is his verified Facebook page. Hope it helps. Editor5454 (talk) 12:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ouch, sorry for presumption; I've struck it. The wording from "In this Indian name" etc seems still iffy though and needs to be removed? Patronymic page, even with all the listed variations, has nothing about stage names using it. Says in the first line that it is "a component based on given name of father" and that here is Puttaswamy. Rajkumar is stage name component based on father's stage name. --Hemanthah (talk) 18:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply