Talk:Sembawang Hot Spring Park/GA1

GA Review

I'm going to take over the review for this article. It looks pretty good. Here are a few minor things to improve:

• In the history section, every paragraph begins with "In (date)". Mix it up to make it more interesting.

• Fixed that. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

• "the spring's flow was interrupted for a while" - is it known how approximately how long?

• On the assumption that no accurate records were likely to have been kept on the state of a relatively minor geographical feature during the country's invasion, I changed "for a while" to "temporarily". --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 01:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

• "As a result of the negative publicity, and the redevelopment of the area around the spring, public interest began to wane and the number of visitors dwindled." - source?

 Done. Source added. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 06:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

That's it. The article will be on hold for seven days to allow for improvements. Good luck! Nikki311 23:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

My goodness, 4 consecutive reviews to date, esp when the previous review by Juliancolton on June 6 is still pending. It seems the successive reviews one after another, and the increasing no. of participants involved, is getting hotter than the hot spring itself! When will these reviews ever end? -- Aldwinteo (talk) 06:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Unless anybody has any objections, I feel the article is good enough to pass. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 13:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I was just responding to the request at WP:GAN for an uninvolved reviewer to look at the article, but I agree with Juliancolton. I'll pass the article. Nikki311 16:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Nikki311 & Juliancolton for your review & the suggested touch-ups in helping to bring a final closure to this case. Cheers! -- Aldwinteo (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)