Talk:Self-indication assumption doomsday argument rebuttal

Philosophy: Epistemology / Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Philosophy of religion

"Natural"? edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Doing a disambig run on Natural, and I'm not enough of a mathematician to know if the word "natural" used in the "Remarks" section of this article should go to Nature or Natural transformation - or, indeed, somewhere else. Could someone please help? Thanks. Tevildo 04:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've decided to unlink it altoghether. Feel free to put it back in if necessary. Tevildo 01:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic