Talk:San Sebastian College – Recoletos/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Moray An Par (talk) 05:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Consider rewriting the lead. One-sentence paragraphs are not preferred.

   The lead should be a summary of the article. Limit bolding to the first mention of the name and alternative names (including abbrevs). MOS:BOLD

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references are SSC published. They are also not properly formatted.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Academics section fail. Include enrolment, admission and graduation data. Discuss/tabulate foundation of major units. See WP:UNIGUIDE.

   I don't think the "system" section belongs to the article. If the system is notable, consider creating a separate article and discuss here its relation to the system. It seems the system is a different unit from the college, and therefore must not be elaborated in the article. Same case for the Agustinian Recollects section.

   Info on research, student life, athletics, campus and student governance are missing.

   Do not list degree programs offered per WP:UNIGUIDE

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   There is no policy/guideline regarding this but I would prefer if there would be no gallery, and the images are to be integrated into the article.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article has so many concerns that clearly cannot be addressed swiftly. I suggest the nominator to read WP:UNIGUIDE and featured university articles. This nomination is obviously premature, and therefore must be speedily failed. Moray An Par (talk) 05:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)