Talk:SMS Helgoland (1909)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  No edit wars etc.:

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

  Having made a few minor mods to the text, quite happy to pass this - well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

  Thanks for taking the time to review this Ian! Parsecboy (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)