Talk:Rosie the Riveter World War II Home Front National Historical Park
![]() | A fact from Rosie the Riveter World War II Home Front National Historical Park appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mistaken Poster
editOn the Rosie the Riveter page, the J. Howard Miller poster states "J. Howard Miller's "We Can Do It!", commonly mistaken to be Rosie the Riveter" yet on this page for the historical park, the caption for the same image directly contradicts that. Which is true? -- Anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.51.173 (talk) 16:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- I would trust the Rosie article since that one is backed up with a source. I edited the caption accordingly here. howcheng {chat} 21:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070329014126/http://www.cr.nps.gov:80/nr/travel/wwIIbayarea/ric.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/travel/wwIIbayarea/ric.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Renaming
editIt looks like this article was renamed to remove the slash without any discussion or sourcing. A similar name tweak, also by @Mdewman6: on Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park just got reverted by @Dcflyer:; I'm not sure exactly how to revert name changes cleanly, so I'll just leave a note here. I do note that the legislation to create the park includes the slash (see https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/4063/text ) and that the current NPS website, while it expresses the name in multiple ways, does include the slash in multiple instances on the web pages reachable from https://www.nps.gov/rori/index.htm JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 15:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Your point is well taken. I was being bold in trying to tie to official names, but did not consider that the underlying legislation would be different. I am happy to move it back if that is the consensus. I guess this raises the question of whether to adhere to the official name per Congress or the more common name per NPS. But the fact that NPS uses the backslash intermittently suggests its omission is just an abbreviation of sorts. Mdewman6 (talk) 17:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)