Talk:Rubens (disambiguation)

(Redirected from Talk:Reubens (disambiguation))
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Joy in topic post-move

Requested move 23 March 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus to retain Rubens as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Peter Paul Rubens. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 18:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply


Rubens (disambiguation)Rubens – No article actually named "Rubens". Jax 0677 (talk) 22:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Leaning opposed, as the nominator has not provided a rationale that has any discernable relationship to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • People are often known by their surname, and the painter definitely is, so the initial proposal isn't right. Let's use this opportunity to analyze the usage statistics a bit:
Expand for extended statistics chatter

https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Peter_Paul_Rubens doesn't show the hatnote within the top 20 outgoing destinations for February '24. There's a huge amount of organic interest in this topic so the ratio isn't necessarily relevant, but the relative lack of interest among the outgoing destinations might be.

I looked into the clickstream archive parts I have downloaded so far:

  • clickstream-enwiki-2020-11.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 58
  • clickstream-enwiki-2023-08.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 174
  • clickstream-enwiki-2023-09.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 81
  • clickstream-enwiki-2023-10.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 63
  • clickstream-enwiki-2023-11.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 83
  • clickstream-enwiki-2023-12.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 83
  • clickstream-enwiki-2024-01.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 87
  • clickstream-enwiki-2024-02.tsv:Peter_Paul_Rubens Rubens_(disambiguation) link 76

So it's consistently being clicked (appears in every month that I see), but the volume isn't really impressive.

Let's look at all-time monthly page view statistics for the redirect and the disambiguation page - the latest ratios are:

  • 133 vs 1445 = ~9.2%
  • 131 vs 1483 = ~8.8%
  • 113 vs 1359 = ~8.3%
This sounds like consistently >90% of traffic that lands on this page after following the redirect doesn't click the hatnote.
So all in all this still seems like a reasonable primary redirect. A more coherent argument, based on either usage or long-term significance, should be made instead if we want to make changes here. --Joy (talk) 10:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

post-move

edit

In April '24, https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Rubens_%28disambiguation%29 showed 147 incoming views. We know already this is partial, because incoming redirect traffic isn't counted [10], so we have to look at those separately [11] which shows another 134 + 136 + 0 + 1 = 271 views of incoming redirects. So that should be 418 views in total.

Outgoing clickstreams in turn could identify only 25 to Peter Paul Rubens (~6%). --Joy (talk) 19:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

To be clear, the "post-move" heading is slightly misleading as this page was not moved (at least not since 2007).
Also, just FYI, perhaps you already know this and are choosing to provide more specific details, but if you select "Include redirects" on the Pageview Analysis for Rubens (disambiguation), you get the same 418 count without the extra manual calculations.
And I'm not sure what to make of this, but the Wikinav confusingly says there were 291 incoming views and then says the actual number is 147. However, the Numbers in Context provides a summary breakdown for the incoming views with a total of 291 views -- although even more confoundingly, the percentage of views in that same section uses 147 as the denominator. olderwiser 19:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The title is largely in reference to "Reubens", which did move. Thanks for the tool hint! Overall, I think this might be a testament to merged lists not being great for measurements. We just can't tell how many readers distinguish the 'u' from the 'eu' variant unless we split them up. --Joy (talk) 09:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I hadn't even known about that move discussion. olderwiser 10:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

In May, there were a total of 245 incoming views, and clickstreams could identify 60 visits to Peter Paul Rubens, 11 to Paul Reubens, 10 to Arnold Frans Rubens, and 10 to the Reuben's Restaurant. --Joy (talk) 09:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply