Talk:Quint (International coalition)

NATO Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Hi! edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nice to see that finally there a section here on Wikipedia that talk about the Quint! LuigiPortaro29 (talk)11:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 2 May 2022 edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: the relister's reading of the discussion notwithstanding, it appears that there is consensus to move the page to Quint (international organization) at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 08:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

NATO Quint → Quint (multilateral relations group) – Per this article, the Quint is not exclusive to NATO, but it also participates in topics related to OECD, the G7 and the G20. Thus, it should be renamed, although I am not sure if this is the best potential name we could get. Super Ψ Dro 20:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. FOARP (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oppose but alternative suggestion—I think Quint (international organization) might be better. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
If no-one else votes in this discussion, to avoid it from being closed as no consensus, you can count me as another support for this proposal. Super Ψ Dro 19:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I agree with you , the mame might better Quint international organization'--LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 22:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Relist comment - Super Dromaeosaurus: your proposed move is already counted as a !vote for moving. LuigiPortaro29 - it would probably help if you also said what you think of Ceyockey's proposed alternative name. FOARP (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic