Talk:Phil Scott
(Redirected from Talk:Phillip Scott (politician))
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Feminist in topic New infobox image
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phil Scott article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move 10 November 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 11:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Phil Scott (politician) → Phil Scott – Clear primary topic. The only other two Phil Scotts on Wikipedia, the boxer and the footballer, appear extremely obscure. The governor gets 95% of pageviews. Nohomersryan (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. feminist (talk) | Americans, unite 07:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This article certainly appears to represent the main usage of this name. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support probably should just snowball this. -boldblazer (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Makes sense. Jessamyn (talk) 21:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. — Emperork (talk) 04:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
New infobox image
editCan we switch the infobox image to this? It’s clearer, better lit, it’s more recent, and it feels much more like a formal portrait than the current image, which looks pretty bad by comparison. Thoughts? The Image Editor (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- I like this one you suggested better than the one that is on the page. Jessamyn (talk) 21:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm in favor of changing to the proposed image. Sundayclose (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Changed. feminist (talk) | free Hong Kong 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)