Talk:Phaenias of Eresus

(Redirected from Talk:Phanias of Eresus)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus(talk) 23:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply



Phanias of EresusPhaenias of Eresus – Commoner form in general scholarly usage. Wareh (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Any evidence? Naive searching on Google Books an Scholar seems to indicate the opposite.--Kotniski (talk) 11:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
A standard recent edition is Brill's Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker continued; it spells "Phainias of Eresos." I think if we're sticking with a Latinized spelling, and if we try to measure the choice of different authors for the first vowel of the name (Phai- vs. Pha-), we'll find that Phai-/Phae- handily beats Pha-. See also this article devoted to him, the Cambridge Ancient History, and more of the technical works on chronologists and Peripatetics (in the Google Books results). In general, I get the following on Google Books. The first numbers in parentheses are for the date range 1965-2004, so you can see that the trend is leaving Phanias behind.
  1. 371 (79, JSTOR 9) +"phanias of eresus"
  2. 228 (106, JSTOR 13) +"phaenias of eresus"
  3. 147 (121, JSTOR 46) +"phainias of eresos"
  4. 119 (32, JSTOR 12) +"phanias of eresos"
  5. 18 (9) +"phainias of eresus"
  6. 16 (10) +"phaenias of eresos"
So in the recent period (I omit the last few years because of the explosion of public domain reprints from Google Books), we have Phai-/Phae- "winning" by 246 to 111. In my experience Google Scholar is pretty useless in Classics; I provide JSTOR results but note that they're not for the exact phrase (thus Phainias of Eresos returns non-English-language items). Wareh (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phaenias of Eresus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply