Talk:People's Political Power Party of Canada

Untitled

Couldn't this party be considered Christian Democratic? Their social conservativism and their economic policies almost seem to me to be sort of a radical version of Christian democracy. 24.32.220.158 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC) James

This statement is pretty POV but...they seem like a Christian version on the Natural Law Party (i.e. fluffy-bunny). They have some rather, ahem, unusual ideas: like enforcing a seventh-day holiday, and shutting down businesses who disobey. Or, like putting all convicted criminals in the Army (like we need Paul Bernardo running around with a C7 and combat training). I think they are definitely a fringe party. </POV> I don't know what the litmus test is for Christian Democrats on this side of the pond, but they don't appear (at my first perusal) to be related to what I've read about the European variety. --SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 04:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Though it has some similarities, they don't say they are Christian Democratic, or even that they are Christian. Thus, since they don't describe themselves as such, I don't know if we need mention it in the article. That said, I agree with the assessment of it as a (capital F) Fringe party --Quadraxis (talk) 04:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah, Fringe is right, 136 votes at the 2006 elections ? does that even qualify them for notability ? 159.208.34.100 (talk) 14:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Peoplespoliticalpower.png

Image:Peoplespoliticalpower.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Ideology

http://www.peoplespoliticalpower.ca/policies/policybook/Default.html According to the website, they describe themselves as centrist if you read the short paragraph. So I'll make the change since no one object —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.112.135.12 (talk) 02:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC) just because you describe yourself as something doesn't mean that you are something. 174.95.14.27 (talk) 13:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)