Talk:Louisenthal Paper Mill

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 November 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bavaria Low‑importance

	Bavaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article name / proposed move edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I was going to remove the unnecessary comma from the article name, but then started wondering why this has a German name in the first place. The start of lede refers to this with the literal English translation, 'Louisenthal paper mill', although I'm not sure where that's coming from (other than a dictionary). Meanwhile the company's website just calls them 'Louisenthal', from what I could find at least. So it's clear the article needs to be moved (to get rid of the comma), but it's less clear where to? My vote, assuming the article survives the current AfD process, would be to move it to just 'Louisenthal'. (Courtesy-tagging the creator Nippon 725 (talk · contribs)) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please yes proceed Nippon 725 (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not sure 'proceed' with what, but I'll take that as support for my suggestion of Louisenthal. I'll do that if the article survives. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Done. On reflection, I decided to move this to Louisenthal Paper Mill, that being the proper, full and specific name. I've also added a redir from Louisenthal; if other Louisenthal articles later appear, that redir can then be replaced with disambiguation page, and this article won't need to be moved again. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Nippon 725 (talk) 15:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Can you please help correcting the article edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi everybody Can you please tell me what is the mistake So we can correct it I am a new Wikipedian please help correcting it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nippon 725 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The biggest problem, as flagged up by the maintenance tags, is that there are only two references, and they're both citing the company's own website, which is not enough to establish notability. You need to find references backing up every statement made, and also demonstrate significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, per WP:N... or use the ones another editor has kindly found and added to the deletion discussion. While this doesn't guarantee the article will be kept, it certainly improves its prospects considerably. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic