Talk:Paowalee Pornpimon
(Redirected from Talk:Paowalee Pornphimol)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 4 February 2020
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 4 February 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Paowalee Pornpimon per weak consensus. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Paowalee Pornphimol → Paowalee Pornphimon – Pornphimol is a mistransliteration. 165.225.0.81 (talk) 17:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 09:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Move to either Paowalee Pornpimon or
Paowalee Pornpimol; oppose suggested target, which is also plainly incorrect. The spelling should be either Paowalee Pornpimon, which is the spelling found on Spotify, or Paowalee Pornpimol, which is used by English news sources and also gets much more Google hits. However, most of the results are probably automated scrapes mirroring IMDb's listing, and since IMDb is not a reliable source these should be discounted. --Paul_012 (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC)- I've struck the other option, to avoid causing further dilemmas for the closer. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.