Talk:Péter Erdő

(Redirected from Talk:Péter Cardinal Erdõ)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move

edit

I wonder if the word Cardinal is desirable in the title. I suppose not. – On the other hand, õ is certainly not correct; the actual ő should be substituted by o. --Adam78 16:14, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

See List of cardinals Christian-names CARDINAL Familyname is the Wikipedia standard Philip Baird Shearer 10:01, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep it as it is

Remove the title Cardinal

Move to Peter Erdo

Move to Péter Erdo

Move to Péter Erdö


Change the O Option:

Move to Peter Cardinal Erdo No diacritics

Move to Péter Cardinal Erdo remove only second diacritic

  • Support We should use an unaccented o for the moment, with a redirect from umlaut. Gdr 20:02, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC)
  • Support Only those accents are removed in the English Wikipedia which cannot be displayed in titles; all the other diacritics are kept (see eg. Category:Hungarian writers). ő is never substituted by õ; the latter is used on its own right in other languages. As is noted below, cardinal is kept in names. – Thus, in my opinion, this seems to be the only option in accordance with current Wikipedia conventions. I encourage you to check it with a few minutes' investigation. Adam78 10:20, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support violet/riga (t) 11:50, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Move to Péter Cardinal Erdö use ö

Discussion

edit

"Cardinal" in the name as it is adheres to normal naming standards and our MoS. Erdõ seems correct according to http://www.cardinalrating.com/cardinal_29.htm http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/berdo.html. I therefore oppose. violet/riga (t) 16:23, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oppose removing the cardinal title, but if õ is incorrect and ő is technically impossible, what about using ö, as is commonly done when writing Hungarian names in other languages? / Uppland 16:50, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The interposition of "Cardinal" matches the rule given and justified at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Clerical names. Debates about that convention should be at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles), not here. As for the diacritical, I note that on http://www.katolikus.hu/dioc_ang.html it is given with the double acute; on Google the double acute is the most common form of his name on sites in the .hu domain. We should use an unaccented o for the moment, with a redirect from umlaut. Gdr 20:02, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC)

I've reviewed my vote on the subject and, as the voting goes so far, Péter Cardinal Erdo is the favourite. violet/riga (t) 11:50, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 20:32, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Péter Erdő. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Péter Erdő. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Péter Erdő. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply