Talk:Cessna O-2 Skymaster

(Redirected from Talk:O-2 Skymaster)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Screaminhelo in topic Army O-2 Skymaster


Stats

edit

Any chance of getting statistics for these in active duty? Ie, how many were used in vietnam? How many were lost?

Rhodesia's RhAF and Central Intelligence Organization also operated the O-2, though they called it the Lynx and it was armed a bit heavier than the O-2 was in Vietnam. 68.202.55.186 05:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why were the specs removed?

edit

Doesn't look like vandalism. Why were they removed? Rsduhamel 05:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

"B.S. BOMBER"

edit

I would like the fact that this aircraft (O-2B) was nicknamed the "B.S. Bomber" included in this article, It is quoted from the book "Wings for the world II" by William D. Thompson. I have heard that term for this aircraft at Oshkosh, and many other airshows. I added it before but it was done wrong (sorry), so I will let the experts do the Editing this time.. thank you BIGTAZ351W (talk) 04:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)BIGTAZ351W, 7-02-2008Reply

THanks for the book information. If you can give me the page number and edition (year published) of the book, that would help a lot. I should be able to find the ISBN number and the rest of the needed info online, but if you have that too, it would be fine. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 06:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The ISBN is 0-89288-257-3, the page number is 73,It was published in 1995, second paragraph on the left side, last sentce. "It was affectionately known as the 'Bullshit Bomber.'" I apologize for the tardiness of my response. BIGTAZ351W —Preceding unsigned comment added by BIGTAZ351W (talkcontribs) 15:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Remove UNrelated aircraft

edit

It seems to me that the Adam A500 is not really related to the O-2 except that centerline thrust is used. I'm not sure why the AVE Mizar is included as if it were an actual production aircraft, it was a marketing stunt by a car dealer as far as I know. Altaphon (talk) 07:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I suspect that is why the A500 is here, just another push-pull design. These can be safely cleaned up. - Ahunt (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cessna O-2 Skymaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  - Ahunt (talk) 21:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cessna O-2 Skymaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cessna O-2 Skymaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Army O-2 Skymaster

edit

Article states that 2 Navy airframes were transferred to the Army in 1990. It appears that 68-11149 and 68-11150 were transferred from the USAF to Army service. They appear to have been at Tempelhof in 1978.

http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_serials/1968.html https://www.airliners.net/photo/USA-Army/Cessna-O-2A-Super-Skymaster/1315798 Screaminhelo (talk) 01:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply