Talk:Not Quite Hollywood: The Wild, Untold Story of Ozploitation!/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello, I have reviewed this article per the criteria listed at WP:GA?. There is nothing obvious to prevent the promotion of this article to GA, but I'll leave you a free peer review below.

• Images - okay
• Sources - okay
• MOS - okay
• Lead:
  • I don't see the statement "(often shortened to Not Quite Hollywood)" as controversial, so refs are not strictly necessary.
  • The first sentence of the second paragraph is somewhat confusing with the many commas and hyphens. Better split in two.
  • "which were considered vulgar and offensive by critics and film historians" can be written into active voice "which critics and film historians considered vulgar and offensive"
• It's unfortunate that the column templates in the "Interviewees" section cause a considerable gap between the intro sentence and the list (at least on my wide screen), but I guess there is nothing that can be done about it. (I'm just pointing this out in case you know a way around it.)
• Production:
  • the sentence "After becoming an accomplished music video director.." has the word "become" twice
  • "He was close to giving up on the project" runs a little long and has many commas, i.e. potentially confusing for the reader
  • "The film also screened..." - The intro starts with "Not Quite Hollywood [...] was screened" so I am not sure if you forgot a word or if its proper English
• I personally wouldn't link to Australian Film Insitute Award for Best Documentary, as your article is currently the only article linking there.
• It is possible to add the box office winnings to the infobox
• Per [1] no undabbed items (good!)

Promoted. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! All the suggested changes have been made, with the exception of the box office gross in the infobox - I haven't been able to find a running total; the figures in the article are only the earnings for the first two weeks of release. Thanks again, —97198 (talk) 04:52, 12 October 2008 (UTC)