Talk:Not otherwise specified
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 25 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Not Otherwise Specified to Not otherwise specified. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 25 March 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Not Otherwise Specified → Not otherwise specified – This is a medical classification buzzword, not a proper name; not even a noun phrase. Dicklyon (talk) 23:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Data suggest lowercase more common in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 23:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- No objection to the proposed move, as substantial creator of this article. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support - as an obvious case. Primergrey (talk) 05:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Psychotic disorder not otherwise specified
editThis link in the article points to a redirect to the article Psychosis, & not a specific section. Further, there is nothing in that article that explains or even touches on "Not otherwise specified".
Is there anything worth mentioning under this rubric -- which amounts to "miscellaneous of miscellaneous disorders"? Such a concept attracts the curiosity of non-experts: it hints at obscure & esoteric afflictions. Only once a reader starts down this rabbit hole, there is nothing there to see! Which reduces this link to little more than an out-of-character instance in Wikipedia of clickbait! -- llywrch (talk) 15:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)