Talk:No Sleep (LaViVe album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 05:55, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   "noting that the songs sounded like demo versions" - replace noted with 'said' or 'stated' as per WP:WORDS.

    Done Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

   "and picked "I Swear" as the highlight on No Sleep" - I's change this to "... highlight on the album".

    Done Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

   "negatively commented that the record was produced in a considerably short amount of time" - did he mention how the short recording negatively impacted on the album's production? Simply producing an album in a short time would be considered a positive. This needs context if it's available.

    Done Yes, there is context on this, and it is how the short time for recording negatively impacted on the album's production. I tried to reword the sentence... Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   I've always found you very thorough in your articles, but I still have to at least ask, are you sure there isn't any information out there on the album's promotion? And how about tours/live performances?

   There was no specific promotion for the album (or at least I couldn't find anything about that). LaViVe did have a tour for their single "No Time for Sleeping", but that is not promotion for the album itself. Also, the band disbanded soon after the album's release, which further speaks against a possible tour or concerts meant to aid the album. Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Lookin' good. Placing on hold. Freikorp (talk) 06:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

@Freikorp: Thank you very much for your review! I believe I have answered to all your queries raised above. Best regards; Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Excellent, outstanding work, happy to pass this now. :) Freikorp (talk) 10:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)