Talk:State Route 74 (New York–Vermont)/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   "Both were then supplanted by New York State Route 73, which remained intact until it was truncated to US 9 and Route 74, which was once used in Western New York, was moved onto this routing." - split this sentence. "56 merges in soon after." - better to have CR 56; it's more formal, and state routes are usually called Route X in prose. "12 miles" should be converted to kilometers.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Some things (Fort Ticonderoga, seasonal ferry) are mentioned in the intro without being explained in the body of the article. Is this area a city? Rural? Suburban?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Could use an image, but not necessary. Heck, an image of Ticonderoga would suffice until one of the road is found.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   —Rob (talk) 04:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

How does it look now? I tried solving all your problems.Mitch32^(UP) 10:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

You got a few... if you could add information from [1] to the article, it's needed. —Rob (talk) 20:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Not really a reliable source, its missing needed information and its not clear who is publishing the information. Please reply.Mitch32^(UP) 18:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The LCTC page makes no mention of the Ticonederoga ferry... is that page wrong, or this page? —Rob (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Error on my part - I changed it using your ref, but I don't like using it.Mitch32^(UP) 22:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

All right... it's worth investigating further, especially if that webpage ends up being the company's official page. —Rob (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)