Talk:Neosho-class monitor/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   surrendered might be a little WP:EGGy. Maybe "just over a month after Union forces captured the city after a two month long siege." or something like that (though that's a little wordy).

   Done.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The last sentence in the short para in the service section, with "David Campbell 17 August 1873[5] for $13,600.[2]" - that looks rather ugly. Might you move the DANFS ref to the previous sentence and then replace the Gibbons ref with a footnote like "For the date and location of sale, see Neosho, DANFS; for the price, see Gibbons, p. 57."

   Done.

   One {{cn}} tag needs to be addressed.

   Done.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Not too much to fix here, nice work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Ping.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)