Talk:NAPA Auto Parts

(Redirected from Talk:National Automotive Parts Association)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 24.237.158.234 in topic Bad parts, do you have your receipt

Redirect

edit

Napa in mixed case refers to the Napa Valley. NAPA is an acronym and refers to the National Automotive Parts Association and is styled in all caps. If Napa redirects here, then it might be necessary to create a Napa Valley page and redirect to that. There are also other "napa" references, Ayia Napa and Nappa leather.Coromero (talk) 14:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Redirect

edit

Um why does Napa go here? Surely, the Napa Valley is at least as notable?

Fair use rationale for Image:NAPAlogo.jpg

edit
 

Image:NAPAlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:NAPAlogo.jpg

edit
 

Image:NAPAlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Genuine Parts Annual Company Report

edit

The citation "Genuine Parts Company Annual Report file:///C:/Users/362937/Downloads/2014+Annual+Report%20(1).pdf". {{cite web}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help) was removed with this edit made by FreeRangeFrog, but was subsequently re-added a few days later by Coromero. I have removed it again for the same reasons given by FreeRangeFrog in their edit sum. This particular source may be acceptable per WP:PSTS, but linking to the C drive of someone's personal computer is not. Sources do not have to be online (though it helps), but they must be published and available for verification. There's no way to verify what it saved onto a person's computer's hard drive. - Marchjuly (talk) 00:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 9 March 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 17:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply



National Automotive Parts AssociationNAPA Auto Parts – The majority of hits on google seem to use "NAPA Auto Parts" or "Napa Auto Parts" as opposed to the full name, including official sources. Evidence points to "NAPA Auto Parts" being the WP:COMMONNAME. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 16:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bad parts, do you have your receipt

edit

Do by phone number , or credit card. Build a history. I’ve bought three common disturber for my fleet of vehicles. And every time I go to the parts store to replace a lifetime warranty. Do you have your receipt no well we can’t help you. NAPA don’t make no damn difference you’ll get your money regardless. But the store says oh we can’t replace your parts unless we have a receipt .

When you have a lot of vehicles, and I use you for a supplier, and you screw us like this. This cost me millions. You need to do a different quit being such a cheapskate. 24.237.158.234 (talk) 08:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply