Talk:Indigenous Albuquerque

Myla Vicenti Carpio was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 April 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Indigenous Albuquerque. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Low-importance).

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Women in Red: Books by women (2023)

This article was created or improved during the Books by women edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in April 2023. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Smith, Andrea (2011). "Indigenous Albuquerque (review)". Wicazo Sa Review. 26 (2): 110–112. doi:10.1353/wic.2011.0012. ISSN 1533-7901.
Jojola, Ted (2012). "Review of Indigenous Albuquerque by Myla Vicenti Carpio". Studies in American Indian Literatures. 24 (4): 115–118. doi:10.5250/studamerindilite.24.4.0099. ISSN 0730-3238.
Shreve, Bradley (2012). "Review: Indigenous Albuquerque". Western Historical Quarterly. 43 (1): 90–90. doi:10.2307/westhistquar.43.1.0090. ISSN 0043-3810. JSTOR westhistquar.43.1.0090.
Hugill, David (2015). "Book review: Indigenous Albuquerque". Urban Studies. 52 (2): 395–396. doi:10.1177/0042098014559497. ISSN 0042-0980. JSTOR 24855640.

Myla Vicenti Carpio

Latest comment: 1 year ago9 comments4 people in discussion

Just for the record, the decision to merge the biography into the book does not reflect the majority views from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myla Vicenti Carpio. Including the original proposal to delete, there were 2.5 votes to delete (Xxanthippe voted "Delete or Redirect"), 3.5 to merge, and 11 to keep. The result should have been to "Keep" or "No consensus." Carpio does more than just write. Yuchitown (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)YuchitownReply

You can request a review of the decision at WP:DRV if you first raise it with the editor who closed the discussion. My advice is that if you try to argue it based on the number of !votes, you will not succeed, as it is never about number of opinions. This is not me expressing any opinion on the merits of the close, I argued to keep the article. CT55555(talk) 18:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Right. I just wanted to point this out. I can't believe we already wasted so much energy discussing an bio that far superior to many out there. Yuchitown (talk) 19:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)YuchitownReply

I do agree. The logic that one book she wrote is notable, while she, the author of the book who has done so much more than one book is not, really shows how illogical Wikipedia guidelines can be. CT55555(talk) 20:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I was baffled to see the closing remarks. BhamBoi (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@User:Eddie891 in the context of at least three of us being surprised by how this was closed, I wondered if you had any comment, if you would find a request for deletion review to be reasonable in the circumstances? CT55555(talk) 21:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think any time a participant in an AFD can't understand the closing as how it fit with consensus, DRV can be justified. I will note that, even in reviewing, I can't see how I would have closed differently, when considering that AfD is not a vote, and wikipedia policy. But by all means feel free to put it up for review. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your understanding. I have asked for the review here Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 April 22. CT55555(talk) 23:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Of course! If I misunderstood consensus, it should be overturned and rectified. I have nothing to hide, no agenda worth pushing. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic