Talk:Laguna Miscanti

(Redirected from Talk:Miscanti Lake)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review


GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Miscanti Lake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


I'll look at this tomorrow when I am more awake! — GhostRiver 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede edit

  • No comma after "of the Antofagasta Region"
    Removed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Miñiques volcano" → "The Miñiques volcano"
    I don't think that a "the" is strictly necessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • To be pedantic, the "Antofagasta Region" is not mentioned in the body and is not cited
    Now it is with citation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Diacritic needed in "Laguna Miñiques"
    Done? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Geography edit

  • Laguna Miñiques should be linked upon its first mention (5,000 tourists) and delinked in the following clause
    It already is in the lead? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hydrography and geology edit

  • "It is a maximally" → "Laguna Miscanti is a maximally"
    Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Diacritic needed for Cerro Miñiques
    Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Delink Laguna Miñiques in this section

Hydrology edit

  • "ranging from the Miocene to Holocene age"
    Not sure that this is correct - Miocene is often a modifier to "age" rather than a proper noun. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Climate edit

  • "a little warmer" – can we be more precise?
    No, sorry. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Delink Holocene, linked above
  • Hyphen to em dash in "late Pleistocene-early Holocene wet period"
    Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Biology edit

  • Comma after "Widgeonweed grows at the lakeshores"

References edit

  • The first two sources are inconsistent with the citation style used in all future refs
  • All online sources should have access dates, including the journal articles being linked
    I don't think that journal sources get access dates even when linked. I think I got the reports, however. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

General comments edit

  • Image and map are properly licesned and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks good
    @GhostRiver: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
    • Jo-Jo Eumerus I have left additional comments on the sections I did not get to earlier. — GhostRiver 01:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
      • @GhostRiver: I think all is done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
        • I have made a few additional changes myself; things linked in the lede still need to be linked upon their first mention in the body. In any case, I am passing this article. — GhostRiver 16:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply