Talk:Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk • contribs • count) 18:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Decent looking article

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   no problems here

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   no problems here

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   no problems here

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   no problems here

   C. No original research:

   no problems here

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   no problems here

   B. Focused:

   no problems here

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   no problems here

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   no problems here

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   no problems here

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   no problems here

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   excellent article; apart from the one-sentence paragraph used, there's no problem to pass it