Talk:Martha Rainville

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)


Untitled

edit

On July 10, 2006, annonymous user 207.136.224.178 added material to this article regarding campaign finance controversies that have come up in the Rainville campaign. This material appears generally factual and is important to include in the article, but as currently written, it reads like an anti-Raiville editorial. It needs to be cleaned up, edited into NPOV/encyclopedic language, and facts need to be properly cited.Cbvt 22:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

It should be noted (although I do not have good NPOV sources other than the Jeffords quote) that many in the state wanted to vote for her, but could not bring themselves to send a Republican to Washington, given current national politics. She would have done (and probably will do) much better in a State office election (or as an independent, who would not vote for national Republican leadership) —MJBurrageTALK13:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

edit

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Martha Rainville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply