Talk:Mario Ortiz (Spanish footballer)

(Redirected from Talk:Mario Ortiz Ruiz)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by BD2412 in topic Requested move 6 November 2020

Requested move 6 November 2020 edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved to country-disambiguated titles. There is a clear consensus to move, but no clear consensus as to which alternative raised in the discussion should be chosen. Since there is no specific likelihood of country confusion between the two subjects under examination, and this broadly seems to be the least objectionable option in the discussion, I will move the pages accordingly. BD2412 T 06:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

WP:COMMONNAME for both is just "Mario Ortiz", neither use maternal surname or middle name professionally. Disambiguate to standard for footballers. Source for Spanish footballer: 1, 2, 3, 4, all refs on page. For Mexican footballer: 1, 2, 3. Ortizesp (talk) 14:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 12:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (sportspeople)#Association football (soccer) which gives equal importance to YOB as to nationality, and reflecting long-held convention at WP:FOOTBALL that prefers YOB to nationality given that nationality in football is fluid. GiantSnowman 12:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support alternative option. Nationality is a useful qualifier here, and preferred by WP:NCPDAB. --BDD (talk) 20:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support original option only the nationality disambiguator seems to be DrKay's pet project crusade, and most football articles are disambiguated by year of birth. If you want to challenge that, start an RFC on it at WT:FOOTY. But original option is the correct option. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Don't harass me please. I don't wish to challenge the current guidance, which is why I have not done so. Indeed, I'm directly quoting it above as part of my rationale. See Wikipedia:Civility#Identifying incivility: points 1d and 2e. DrKay (talk) 11:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Every time somebody replies to one of your comments is not "harassment". Do not throw out such serious & unsubstantiated accusations. GiantSnowman 20:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's not a reply. It's just a blatant misrepresentation, deliberately designed to belittle and abuse, like yours. DrKay (talk) 20:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.