Talk:Manuel Gomes da Costa

(Redirected from Talk:Manuel de Oliveira Gomes da Costa)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

"Incompetence"

edit

I think it is pretty obvious that Gomes da Costa's "incapability" for office was a pretext Carmona used to remove his fellow officer from the presidency. Carmona exerted a lot of effort to cement this idea of an incompetent Gomes, but he wanted to as this was an act of abject disloyalty towards a senior officer, and he needed to counter the idea of "regicide" from within the ranks. But while Gomes' actions were sometimes erratic, one needs to keep in mind that the situation was chaotic and Carmona's own decisions could also be contradictory. I've amended the text. --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 10:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manuel de Oliveira Gomes da Costa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply