This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"This ambush was the turning point in the expansion of the Muslim world; the largest and fastest expansion since Alexander the Great. Gradually successful counter-attacks drove the invaders back out of France."
I have excised the above text from the article - it is a broad, unreferenced claim that is, according to my reading, questionable. It also has little direct relevance to Majolus of Cluny.--Iacobus (talk) 23:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is obviously heavily biased in favor of pietistic Catholic viewpoints. It uncritically repeats miracles without any effort at a critical point-of-view. It nowhere strives for neutrality, taking the Cluniac point of view unreservedly. A major rewrite is needed, once better sources are located. Web pages devoted to the devotion of Catholic saints are inadequate.
