Talk:Liverpool F.C. in international football/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: found two, fixed one, Luis García, I removed the wikilink from Peter Robinson as there appears to be no article on him in Wikipedia, he is not listed at the disambiguation page.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 19:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Liverpool team competed in the UEFA Cup Winners' Cup during Paisley's first season. Missing indefinite article.

   and a 1–1 at the Olympiastadion in Bruges ensured Liverpool won their second UEFA Cup. Missing "result"?

   As League champions during the 1975–76 Liverpool entered the 1976–77 The 1976-77 what?

   scoring inside the first two minutes courtesy of Kevin Keegan. "who scored?

   'With six minutes remaining David Fairclough was brought on to replace John Toshack, within seconds of replacing Toshack he had scored to make it 3–2 on aggregate in Liverpool's favour and ensure their passage to the semi-finals. semi-colon rather than comma?

   Victory over FC Zurich of Switzerland saw Liverpool face Borussia Mönchengladbach in the final, who were the opposition in the 1973 UEFA Cup Final. Who were their opponents?

   This article is poorly written and fails the criterion WP:GACR #1 well written. please get it copy-edited. This should have been addressed before nomination. The examples above are from the first few sections but the article is poorly written throughout. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references check out, assume good faith for off-line sources

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   will need updating for the 2010/11 season, what about the Europa league?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   images check out

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for the article to get a thorough copy-edit, query re Peter Robinson, updates for 2010/11 season?. Seven days hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

   Well there have been a couple of minor edits, but no real progress has been made, so I will not list at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

The writer hasn't edited in a month+, might as well fail it now. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

I pinged the nominator by email, it appears that they are now editing the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)