Talk:List of aircraft of the Royal New Zealand Air Force and Royal New Zealand Navy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of aircraft of the Royal New Zealand Air Force and Royal New Zealand Navy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have some photos to put here
editI went to Whenuapai on the weekend and have some good photos of aircraft which could help this page so I wil put them on here. I am new to Wikipedia, so I have to wait until I get 10 edits befpre I can do the uploads. Although I am new, I have a friend who has been on wikipedia for sometime who is telling me how to upload. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenkeeper (talk • contribs) 20:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC) (Sorry, I forgot to put the tildes Greenkeeper (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC))
Spud One
editBoeing 727 says 'The 727 that carried New Zealand Prime Minister Jim Bolger was known as Spud One.' The link for 'Spud One' comes here but there is no mention of it here. Is 'Spud One' a proper usage (similar to the US Air Force One or was it juts a once off joke? Stepho talk 04:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Confused listings makes for ease-of-use issues
editI have a serious issue with the way that both the lists of RNZAF registrations and year-to-year dates they served are almost the same construction on the page — a set of numbers separated from another set by a dash. This isn't really good enough.
The other issue is that, for a serious researcher, the manufacturer's construction numbers are missing from the listings. A serious deficiency. Lin (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2012 (UTC)