Talk:Line of Duty series 6

(Redirected from Talk:Line of Duty (series 6))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Felix QW in topic Split proposal

Warnings

edit

  Do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia articles. This behaviour is viewed as disruptive. To continue could result in loss of editing privileges.
Also, more importantly, Plagiarism. Blatant copy of BBC material is a breach of copyright and has been reported. Please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. [1] Clearly copied 'n' pasted.
You cannot write a summary of a plot that is yet to be broadcast.
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Supporting cast

edit

It is missing the following: Jesus, Mary and Joseph and the wee donkey as themselves. There's a 99.95% chance of this being correct, and the CPS are happy that the threshold has been met to add this info. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Aw, Mother of God, don't risk DCS Carmichael catching sight of this!
All Hell will be set loose.
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I will only make mobile edits (on my burner phone), and make them to the letter of the law! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

James Nesbitt

edit

Several aggressive editors have inserted James Nesbitt into the cast list. Nesbitt did not appear in this series. He is not included in the on screen credits. His character was unseen, non speaking and was represented by two photographs of Nesbitt. This needs explaining if he is to be included, despite several aggressive editors removing the explanation multiple times. If he is to be included, the explanation is needed. I don't think he should be included at all. He did not appear in this series. Or any other series.50.200.89.170 (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Split proposal

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
There is no consensus on splitting the article. Felix QW (talk) 20:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acronyms

edit

I imagine this comment might apply to the pages for all of the series to date, but is it good form to ask a Wikipedia reader to do a web search to learn the meanings of acronyms such as DCI on their first usage in the page? Would it not be better on their first usage to spell out what they are and then provide the acronym in parens for later usage in the page? I do not know if the meaning of these acronyms is obvious to UK readers, but perhaps it would be better to assume they are not obvious in other parts of the world. Frank Lynch (talk) 22:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply