Talk:Lifting condensation level
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 30 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Lifted condensation level to Lifting condensation level. The result of the discussion was moved. |
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 30 August 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved, treated as an uncontested technical request. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Lifted condensation level → Lifting condensation level – Lifting condensation level is almost ubiquitously the WP:COMMONNAME. Amongst others, the NOAA, articles in the Journal of Atmospheric Science, Oxford Reference and (from what I can tell) all the sources cited use lifting. Whilst not of the highest quality, Google Ngrams shows a clear preference for lifting as well. – Isochrone (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)