Talk:Letter of appointment (Mormonism)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 21 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Letter of appointment to Letter of appointment (Mormonism). The result of the discussion was moved. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Letter of appointment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124113011/http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/diamond.htm to http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/diamond.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080103192848/http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/prophetic_controversyB.htm to http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/prophetic_controversyB.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 21 August 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 19:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Letter of appointment → Letter of appointment (Mormonism) – "Letter of appointment" is a generic term with a wide variety of uses. In English Wikipedia, the phrase occurs 132 times, of which only 8 are the Mormon/LDS use. Any disambiguator would be acceptable, but by remaining at this title this article is a WP:SURPRISE for those looking for uses in political, judicial, diplomatic, religious, contractual and many other areas. For this reason the page move should not leave a redirect behind. This is not usual, but given the large number of alternative meanings I think we could WP:IAR here for a better result. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom and WP:ASTONISH. estar8806 (talk) ★ 18:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Support per above—blindlynx 19:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
@MaterialWorks: The consensus to close here was in response to my nomination statement the page move should not leave a redirect behind. Would you please fix. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Shhhnotsoloud: You should probably ask an admin to delete that redirect for you (maybe tag it under WP:G6?). – MaterialWorks 20:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @MaterialWorks: I have CSD'd it in order to correct your error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- @MaterialWorks, Estar8806, and Shhhnotsoloud: I have deleted Letter of appointment with the edit summary
- Redirect left behind in error. Please see Talk:Letter of appointment (Mormonism)#Requested move 21 August 2023. I'm fine with re-creating this as a disambiguation page - as you can see from my contributions, a "letter of appointment" would for me to possibly be a synonym of Letters patent. I do note that this is *one* letter, and a controversial one. Please do let me know if I have made a mistake here.
- Hopefully this fixed things up. As always, please do let me know if I have made a mistake there. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- @MaterialWorks, Estar8806, and Shhhnotsoloud: I have deleted Letter of appointment with the edit summary
- @MaterialWorks: I have CSD'd it in order to correct your error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)