Talk:Lynx Rapid Transit Services/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Airplaneman ✈ 06:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I am making minor fixes myself as I read. Please check them over to make sure I didn't change any of the facts inadvertently. Something that confused me was the last sentence in the first paragraph in the section "Rolling stock":

   The trams cost $3.8 million each and were delivered (are to be) by Siemens between January-March 2010.

   What does are to be mean? Airplaneman ✈ 23:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Corrected. The statement was placed there as a placeholder as the trams were being delivered. as they have now been delivered the statement is no longer needed. Patriarca12 (talk) 02:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

All good! Airplaneman ✈ 03:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Suitably referenced. Checklinks clear; the only green link is an "intro" site; could you instead link the site it leads to? Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 00:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Link to actual flash document corrected. Patriarca12 (talk) 02:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Checklinks clear. Airplaneman ✈ 03:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I learned something new today. Airplaneman ✈ 00:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Y Airplaneman ✈ 00:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable. Airplaneman ✈ 00:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Impressive; I see you took many of them yourself. Airplaneman ✈ 06:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   The issues have been addressed; I will gladly pass this GA :) Airplaneman ✈ 03:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

On hold for seven days for minor issues to be addressed. Airplaneman ✈ 00

19, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick review and taking the time to make those minor prose edits. I have been working on this one since the beginning and am glad to finally have it nearing GA status. Please let me know if anything else needs to be corrected or clarified. Cheers! Patriarca12 (talk) 02:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)