Talk:Kipling station

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dom497 in topic GA Review

Article reorganization

edit

This article has been edited to conform with a standard scheme for subsections proposed here: Talk:Toronto_subway_and_RT#Individual_Station_articles_-_a_standard_scheme_for_subsections -A.Roz (talk) 04:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kipling (TTC)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:20, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    See comment section below. Issues with references not fixed within 7 days. See last comment in comment section for more info.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    See comment section below. Good.
    C. No original research:  
    See comment section below. Good.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    The article will be on hold for 7 days to allow the issues below to be addressed.--Dom497 (talk) 22:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC) See last comment below for reason of failing the article.--Dom497 (talk) 21:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  • "Currently it serves the high density residential and commercial developments that are being built, while acting as a hub for commuter travel", needs a ref.
  • "East of the station towards Islington, the line continues on the surface alongside the railway right-of-way which paralleling Dundas Street at a distance. After crossing over Bloor Street to the north side, it takes the alignment parallel to Bloor as the line goes underground", needs a ref.
  • The "Service" section of the article needs refs.
    • Done - Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
      • Not quite done yet. Some of the refs are missing the publisher, access date/retrieved date, and date (if applicable).--Dom497 (talk) 13:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
        • I added a reference to the "Service" section which is what this paragraph refers to. Anything else noted above, I am leaving to you and the nominator, who seems totally disinterested. That's too bad. The focus of what I do is not based on any need to be judged or rated. Thanks for what you have done here anyway. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
          • Its been 7 days and I am failing the article for the following reason: Issues with the references have not been fixed and are not actively being worked on (it is not my job to fix this issue). Once the refs are fixed, re-nominated this article and let me know on my talk page. I will be glad to review this article again once the issue is fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 21:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply