Talk:Jonathan Lewis (oncologist)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editThe research materials for Dr Jonanathan Lewis only exist in medical books and other medical journals. These references are not easily cited through other means. Unless some one has access to reference materials to other sources, I welcome the contribution. If linking to Google books are not allow, I will remove them. Nobu.nyc (talk) 04:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I want to add a section on Dr. Lewis' body of scientific and academic works. Could anyone recommend a good example that I could look at? Nobu.nyc (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I was introduced to Lewis through Wyche Fowler and Bill Clinton. He has helped me (and many others) a lot. I have done extensive research on this fellow in the UK, SA, and the USA. My edit this morning triggered some nasty comments from Mr. Falcon (within a few minutes). My, and other edits on him are all highly factual. —Preceding unsigned comment added by British Journalist (talk • contribs) 15:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Regardless of how he has helped you or not, this article isn't written in a manner befitting an encyclopedia article. -Falcon8765 (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Specifically, it's written like this guy is the god of Oncology. -Falcon8765 (talk) 20:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
This article has several contributors, and while not perfectly written, is consistent with the style of an encyclopedia, the London Times, or the Washington Post. I have also done investigation of this fellow, and these facts in the article are consistently borne out. Moreover, most of the cases listed in this article have died. He surely does not seem like a god of oncology with this kind of success rate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by British Journalist 2 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)