Talk:Nanshin-ron

Japan: History Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:53, October 18, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the History task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Southeast Asia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Japan may be able to help!

If anyone can understand the article, feel free to do something about the punctured punctuation, fried formatting, splintered spelling, ground grammar, and any other alliterative thing that needs doing. Kelisi 03:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Can anyone identify the original source and the process through which it appeared here in English? It looks like machine translated language. When the mood seizes me I will work a bit on the language and in the process (hopefully) figure out what was meant, but the history of this text would be both interesting and useful. Dewobroto 15:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article was almost complete illegible gibberish. Not only was grammar, punctuation and spelling incorrect, it made no logical sense, and appeared to be partly machine-translated, partly copied from some other source. It was also full of inaccuracies. Hopely this new, cleaned up version will be easier to follow. --MChew 05:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic