Talk:Iranian reformists

(Redirected from Talk:Iranian Reformists)
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 24 January 2024

Requested move 24 January 2024 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. per consensus. – robertsky (talk) 07:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


Iranian ReformistsIranian reformists – Per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:DOCTCAPS. Obvious preference for lowercase in RS sources. See related discussion at Talk:Iranian Principlists. I don't oppose other versions such as "reformists (Iran)" or "reformism (Iran)". (t · c) buidhe 05:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom. Dicklyon (talk) 15:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per WP:NCCAPS, MOS:CAPS. This is overwhelmingly lowercase in sources (e.g., over 90% lowercase in in Google Scholar results [1]). The capitalized form is so rare it doesn't even rate in ngrams [2][3], with the exception of the phrase "Reformism in Iran"[4], but even in that case, the ngram does nothing to exclude title-case titles and headings, and the capitalization is still not dominant anyway. Efforts to ngram phrases that exclude title-case uses of that term produce too few matches to plot [5], which suggests that the term is too uncommon to be treated as a proper name in the first place, and is simply a descriptive phrase. Per MOS:DOCTCAPS in particular, WP does not capitalize political "camps", factions, movements, etc.; this is not a political party capitalized as a proper name across nearly all the source material.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  16:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support—It's plural, so not a proper name. Tony (talk) 02:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Move to Reformists (Iranian faction) or Reformists (Iran) or similar. It seems like "Iranian" is only a disambiguator here. (Otherwise would support the lowercase suggestion per SMcCandlish and MOS:DOCTCAPS.) —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.