Talk:Interstate 88 (Illinois)

Mention of the 'other' I88

Somehow, there should be mention of the other I88 in NY. If you don't read the tiny mention on one of the other pages, or go through the dab page, you may never know it really exists. Remember, people are idiots. Even with (west) and (east), people may not notice. Otherwise, there should be a link to a separate page or at least the information in the one article about these discontinuous numbers. Andyross (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Well... the page title is Interstate 88 (west), so the only way one can end up at this article, expecting Interstate 88 (east) is if they followed a (very) broken link or came through the disambiguation page. There's even a table at the bottom of the page that points to I-88(W) and I-88(E), so I'm not seeing the opportunity for confusion. —Rob (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I have taken the initiative to add "FOR" links to both pages. This is a small change that should help anyone who is confused by this. Coopman86 (talk) 06:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

See Talk:Interstate 88 (east) for more information on this subject and to see a debate on if FOR tags should be present. Coopman86 (talk) 05:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Tollway exit numbers

Where are these random tollway exit numbers coming from? As of recently, I'm pretty sure the tollway still does not officially number their exits. —Rob (talk) 20:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Better call Downers Grove and tell them to take the signs down west of North Aurora then. If you drive westbound from Orchard to DeKalb or even further, to I-39, you'll see them, they can't be missed. It's likely, but I don't know for sure, that there aren't any east of there YET because of the ongoing construction (e.g. IL 31 has no exit # at this time). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.7.38 (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

I haven't been out there in about 3 months, but I do travel the I-88 corridor between IL 59 and I-355 an awful lot (and I-355 also). I'll keep an eye out for exit numbers to see if they pop up. —Rob (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

The exit numbers are not posted but they are available on maps, and official documents. The exits are numbered after the mile marker they are located near. Coopman86 (talk) 06:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

The remaining exit signs are finally going up, nearly five years later. Farnsworth is officially Exits 119 A/B now, for example. I'm not sure there's one up for Route 59, due to the ongoing bridge/exit reconstruction, but they're up for Winfield. Can't say I've paid attention passing Eola.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 88 (Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011142849/http://highwayexplorer.com/il_EndsPage.php?id=3088&section=1 to http://highwayexplorer.com/il_EndsPage.php?id=3088&section=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)