Requested move 5 January 2024 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 14:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


WP:NOPRIMARY , there is no primary topic, the Colorado creek article is a substub and a more substantial amount of text about the Texas creek exists in its valley article -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Rivers has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Disambiguation has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Articles for creation has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I was the AfC acceptor, and even I second guessed myself after accepting it when I realised the primary was a stub. Happy to move this. Qcne (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I concur KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC).Reply
Comment If this does go through, Howard Creek should instead be moved to Howard Creek, Colorado per WP:NATDIS. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, rivers typically use parentheses to distinguish from settlements which typically use comma disambiguation. See WP:NCPLACEDAB olderwiser 01:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.