Talk:Reticulate whipray

(Redirected from Talk:Honeycomb stingray)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Yzx in topic GA Review
Good articleReticulate whipray has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 13, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the honeycomb stingray (pictured) has expanded its range into the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal?

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Honeycomb stingray/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 12:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Will commence read through and post any comments as I come across issues. If neccessary I might make alterations to prose as I proceed - if I accidently change the meaning then please feel free to reverse those changes. Miyagawa (talk) 12:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Had to look up "fishes" because I was sure the correct plural was simply fish - but you were right, it's fishes when talking about multiple different species. Miyagawa (talk) 12:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Can't see any issues with the article that would prevent it from being graded a GA. I can tell you've done a few of these. :) Miyagawa (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply