Move?

edit

Shouldn't this be History of East Pakistan (1947-1971) or even just merged with East Pakistan ? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 16:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I second this. It should be considered the history of East Pakistan. It would definitely be history through the eyes of East Pakistan's majority population, i.e Bangladeshis, but for accuracy's sake this would have to be considered "The History of East Pakistan". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.236.50.183 (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree. This article should be named History of East Pakistan since Bangladesh did not exist between 1947 and 1971, and this was the official name of the region. I am going to move the article name now. Mar4d (talk) 14:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Pakistan before the Bangladesh War in 1971.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Pakistan before the Bangladesh War in 1971.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 15 November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removed stale POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

edit

An old neutrality tag that appears to have no active discussion has been removed from this page per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant

At this time there is no obvious overarching NPOV problem, and no evidence of ongoing discussion of neutrality, so I've removed the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! Worldbruce (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Autonomy for East Pakistan" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Autonomy for East Pakistan and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Autonomy for East Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 20:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply