Talk:Grumman F11F-1F Super Tiger

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Why rename?

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Why did someone re-direct this article AWAY from the correct designation???????? It should be Grumman F11F-1F Super Tiger. There should be no need for discussion because there is no doubt!!--Petebutt (talk) 22:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The correct title is even used in the article!!!!!--Petebutt (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Every specification of the Tiger with the upgraded engines, makes no mention of weights, centers of gravity, or any other facts? The J-79 weighed several hundred pounds more? "Janes" is not a definitive source. Can we please correct this? 69.46.58.93 (talk) 01:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Move?

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:31, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Grumman F11F Super Tiger → Grumman F11F-1F Super Tiger –

F11F was the US Navy designation for the Tiger NOT the Super Tiger which was F11F-1F, a bit confusing but a lot less confusing than calling Super Tigers Tigers in the same article title Petebutt (talk) 22:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Comment wouldn't it be better to use the post-'62 designation Grumman F-11B Super Tiger ? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
- No. To my knowledge, F-11B was never official, as it was out of all competitions by the time of the McNamara redesignations of 1962. Had the US Navy ordered the Super Tiger into production, it would probably had been designated F12F. - BilCat (talk) 23:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Support - Per nom. Not sure who contested this, or where, or even why. - BilCat (talk) 23:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic