Talk:Gerald Ridsdale
(Redirected from Talk:Gerry Francis Ridsdale)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Adrian J. Hunter in topic Number of victims
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gerald Ridsdale article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Article name edit
Shouldn't the article be called "Gerald Francis Ridsdale", perhaps with a separate page called "Gerry Francis Ridsdale" redirected to here? After all, that's his name. Wocky (talk) 10:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Ridsdale or Risdale? edit
The name appears as 'Risdale' five times.213.127.210.95 (talk) 18:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks for noticing. --Scott Davis Talk 21:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Number of victims edit
Hi Enthusiast01, may I ask where you found 79 as the number of Ridsdale's confirmed victims? The cited source gives a lower number, and the most recent source I can find ([1]) gives 65. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 03:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Now I'm not sure where I saw the figure of 73; but I'm sure I did see it. I found this article which comes to a count of 108, and counting. Enthusiast01 (talk) 04:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Enthusiast01 please try to respect text–source integrity. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 02:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)