Talk:Framlingham Castle/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Hchc2009 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Minor stuff, fix the title capitalization in Johnson, Coad, Liddiard, Plowman, Pugin, Ridgard. Is there a reason that the Bibliography is above the cites and notes? Add missing period for page # in cite #2.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Nicely done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Should be fixed now - cheers! Hchc2009 (talk) 16:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply