Talk:Finesse (Bruno Mars song)/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Finesse (song)/GA1)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by MarioSoulTruthFan in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Minecrafter0271 (talk · contribs) 21:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Here is my GA review for this article.
Article Rundown edit
Lead edit
- Pretty standard lead. Doesn't go into unnecessary detail, and sums up everything that I'll hopefully see later in this article.
Background and Development edit
- I like how it goes into detail on how the song came to be. So far, really good article.
Composition edit
- I am a fan of how it runs through the songs inspiration, with citations, and how it also has an audio media file with a relevant caption. So far, good article.
Critical Reception edit
- Pretty standard section. Goes into a ton of detail, but not too much. Overall, looking good.
Accolades edit
- Let's take a moment to appreciate how much citations are in this article. The only thing I DON'T like about that is that it makes my job as a reviewer harder because there are more sources to check and whatnot. As for the sub-section, I think it's pretty good;
Chart Performance edit
North America edit
- In depth review of the sales. Pretty standard.
International edit
- Again, pretty standard subsection.
Music Video edit
Background and Concept edit
- I didn't know have the stuff in that subsection, so I am happy that the article can teach people new things, if you will.
Synopsis edit
- It does a really good job of saying the main aspects of the video, but not giving any spoilers, if you will, about the video, so hats off to you!
Reception edit
- What about fan reception? Just something to consider.
- The views kinda do that, on top of that is a GA article, so that would be fancruft. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Live Performances and Other Usage edit
- Okay. This section is a little bit long and not too comfortable to navigate. I understand that it is a lot of information, but it would be really great if you could narrow it down a bit.
- Any sugestions? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Closing Comments edit
Overall, pretty good quality article. It is a little bit long, but I understand that the article does have a lot of relevant information. Congrats!
Criteria edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Based on what I have observed, I believe that the article has reached all the necessary criteria to be listed as Good Article under the Good Article Criteria. Congratulations to every editor of this article that help it reach this milestone. Maybe it will be listed as Featured one day, but for now, congratulations! Minecrafter0271 (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)