Talk:February 2013 North American blizzard

(Redirected from Talk:Early February 2013 North American blizzard)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Status as a blizzard

edit

It is pretty clear that the storm was a blizzard. There were blizzard warnings issued, and observations confirm that blizzard conditions were met. Thus, it was a blizzard. The source used to question if it was a blizzard even states, "Meteorological data ­revealed that in many spots across the region, blizzard conditions were reached: three straight hours of blowing or falling snow that reduced visibility to less than a quarter of a mile and winds that frequently gusted to 35 miles per hour or more." The NWS considers it a blizzard; they are the only agency who gives the official American definition for blizzard; it was a blizzard. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Looks like a duck to me - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Looks like a duck to me. As long as you source it in the article, it will be fine. Like that template! Thegreatdr (talk) 14:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

POV-section tag at Name section

edit

Please do not remove this tag, unless one plans on fixing the problem. The problem is simple. The section states that the name “Winter Storm Nemo” was not used by a couple of organizations. However, it does not mention at all that many other organizations did use the term. Until this caveat is added in, the section is simply not neutral. RGloucester (talk) 16:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on February 2013 nor'easter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Early February 2013 North American blizzard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply