The Design Of Everyday Things

edit

I think of the Design of Everyday Things as by far the best of these books by D. Norman -- paradigm shattering, rather than preaching to the converted. To make that perception encylopaedic, can we back it empirically somehow? Sales figures from somewhere? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pelavarre (talkcontribs) 19:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

"More than 100000 sold". See link--Aravn (talk) 09:16, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Date Of Birth

edit

Does anyone have a birth date for this individual?

Yes, someone did add it. Spalding (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

See Also

edit

Speaking from my own experience, I believe people who like Donald Norman's book Things That Make Us Smart are also likely to dig Douglas Hofstadter's and Daniel Dennett's books.

... which may be true, but it doesn't make it a See Also in the encylopaedia, any more than saying that folks who groove to Yes (See Also King Crimson) are also gonna dig Genesis (See Also Peter Gabriel).--Matt Whyndham (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Interlock

edit

I expected to see Interlock_(engineering) linked here, because of how "The Design of Everyday Things" celebrates the useful "first say please" interlocks over the useless "are you sure" prompts that people rapidly learn to answer without thought, e.g., three-year-olds who learn how to click thru software license agreements before learning how to read.

The intro

edit

The intro is currently a bit of a hodge-podge of CV information about Norman. Wikipedia intros should establish the article topic's notability and give a brief summary (WP:INTRO). I'm going to move most of the details from the intro into the main article text. Ashmoo (talk) 11:07, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don Norman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don Norman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

User-centered design section

edit

I believe citation is needed on the claim that the term "User-Centered Design" was removed altogether from the revised version of the book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigjs99 (talkcontribs) 01:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Norman, D. A. The Trouble with Unix: The User Interface is Horrid

edit

Norman, D. A. The Trouble with Unix: The User Interface is Horrid. Datamation, 27 (12) 1981, November, pp. 139-150. Reprinted in Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Bannon, L. J., eds. Perspectives on the Computer Revolution, 2nd revised edition, Hillsdale, NJ, Ablex, 1989.

3MRB1 (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply